3 elements of good health: exercise, nutrition and stress reduction

Mayo Clinic video: Looking to start the new year off healthy? Dr. Larry Bergstrom, an integrative medicine specialist at Mayo Clinic in Arizona, explains the 3 elements of good health:

1. exercise
2. nutrition
3. stress reduction.

Participation in sport is associated with a with a 20—40% reduction in all-cause mortality compared with non-participation. Exercise might also be considered as a fifth vital sign, according to the Lancet: http://goo.gl/gyxYf

Related reading:

Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: 15 minutes a day or 90 minutes a week. Lancet, 2011.

Forming a healthy habit is a marathon, not a sprint - start small, the 66th time's the charm. Chicago Tribune, 2011.

3-gram reduction in daily salt intake would decrease coronary heart disease, stroke, and death

The U.S. diet is high in salt, with the majority coming from processed foods. Reducing dietary salt is a potentially important target for the improvement of public health.

Reducing dietary salt by 3 g per day (1200 mg of sodium per day) is projected to reduce the annual number of new cases of CHD by 60,000 to 120,000, stroke by 32,000 to 66,000, and myocardial infarction by 54,000 to 99,000 and to reduce the annual number of deaths from any cause by 44,000 to 92,000. Such an intervention would be more cost-effective than using medications to lower blood pressure in all persons with hypertension.

The cardiovascular benefits of reduced salt intake are on par with the benefits of population-wide reductions in tobacco use, obesity, and cholesterol levels.

References:

Projected Effect of Dietary Salt Reductions on Future Cardiovascular Disease. NEJM, 2010.
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/362/7/590
Sweat Bees prefer sweaty people because the human diet is so salty that their perspiration is saturated with that essential nutrient. WSJ, 2012.

Image source: Single-serving salt packets. Wikipedia, GNU Free Documentation License.

Liraglutide (Victoza) superior to sitagliptin (Januvia) for reduction of HbA1c in diabetics

Action of DPP-4 inhibitors. Note that DPP-4 normally inactivates GLP-1. DPP-4 inhibitors block DPP-4 which in turn leaves GLP-1 active. Click to enlarge the figure. Created with Gliffy.

What is Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)?

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a GI peptide that stimulates insulin secretion (similar to sulfonylureas). GLP-1 also inhibits glucagon release, gastric emptying and food absorption. GLP-1 and another similar peptide are called incretins. As noted above, incretins have a dual action which leads to lowering blood glucose:

1. Stimulate insulin release
2. Inhibit glucagon release

Exenatide (Byetta) is a GLP-1 receptor agonist approved for adjunctive therapy for patients with DM 2 who are not well controlled on oral agents. It is available only as injections and has to be administered twice daily.

DPP-4 inhibitors, or gliptins, increase GLP-1 levels by blocking the enzyme which inactivates GLP-1. The enzyme is called DPP-4 (dipeptidyl peptidase-4). They act similarly to Byetta (see figure above) but have the big advantage to be available in oral form (pills). Gliptins used for treatment of DM2 include sitagliptin (Januvia) and vildagliptin (Galvus).

What is Liraglutide?

Liraglutide (Victoza) is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog that was developed by Novo Nordisk for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Liraglutide has a half-life after subcutaneous injection of 11–15 hours, making it suitable for once-daily dosing (in contrast to Byetta's twice daily).


Liraglutide. Image source: Wikipedia, public domain.

Liraglutide (Victoza) superior to sitagliptin (Januvia) for reduction of HbA1c in diabetics

This Lancet study assessed the efficacy and safety of the human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide versus the DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin, as adjunct treatments to metformin, in individuals with type 2 diabetes who did not achieve adequate glycaemic control with metformin alone.

More than 600 participants (aged 18—80 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had inadequate glycaemic control (glycosylated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 7·5—10·0%) on metformin (more than 1500 mg daily) were enrolled.

Participants were randomly allocated to receive 26 weeks' treatment with 1·2 mg or 1·8 mg subcutaneous liraglutide once daily, or 100 mg oral sitagliptin once daily.

Greater lowering of mean HbA1c (8·5% at baseline) was achieved with 1·8 mg liraglutide (−1·50%) and 1·2 mg liraglutide (−1·24%) than with sitagliptin (−0·90%).

Nausea was more common with liraglutide (27%) on 1·8 mg. Minor hypoglycaemia was recorded in about 5% of participants in each treatment group.

Liraglutide was superior to sitagliptin for reduction of HbA1c, and was well tolerated with minimum risk of hypoglycaemia. These findings support the use of liraglutide as an effective GLP-1 agent to add to metformin.

References:

Liraglutide versus sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who did not have adequate glycaemic control with metformin: a 26-week, randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial. The Lancet, Volume 375, Issue 9724, Pages 1447 - 1456, 24 April 2010.