Showing posts with label Journal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Journal. Show all posts
BMJ, the first medical journal to launch a website in 1996, shows a
blog-like redesign

BMJ, the first medical journal to launch a website in 1996, shows a blog-like redesign

See the video here: Make the most of the new bmj.com. Editor-in-Chief Fiona Godlee and David Payne explain the redesigned bmj.com website, and some of the new features:




And, of course, you can follow BMJ on:

- Twitter
twitter.com/bmj_latest

- Facebook
facebook.com/bmjdotcom

- YouTube
youtube.com/user/BMJmedia

References:

Welcome to the new design. BMJ.

"The online version is the official journal of record, not the print edition". Start a blog in 2012

"The online version is the official journal of record", wrote the Editor-in-Chief and the editorial staff of Pediatrics, the official journal of the the American Academy of Pediatrics:

"As we start 2012, and welcome the more than 6 million annual visitors to our journal's Web site, we remind our readers that the online version, not the shorter print edition, is the official journal of record. Is it time to do away with the print version? Probably not just yet, but it may not be long until we are heading in that direction.

If you are thinking, “there are so many options to peruse and so little time!” you will find some highlights of each issue in our blog - First Read - which contains previews of articles of interest selected by members of our executive editorial board. We are even running some of our most interesting “fillers” from the print journal in the blog so they are not missed by our online readers"

This is the URL of the blog which is hosted for free on Blogger.com by Google: http://pediatricsblog.blogspot.com

All physicians should consider starting a blog in 2012

I would encourage all physicians to start a blog in 2012 - here is why (quotes from an interview with Seth Godin and Tom Peters):

"Blogging is free. It doesn’t matter if anyone reads it. What matters is the humility that comes from writing it. What matters is the metacognition of thinking about what you’re going to say.

No single thing in the last 15 years professionally has been more important to my life than blogging. It has changed my life, it has changed my perspective, it has changed my intellectual outlook, it’s changed my emotional outlook. And it’s free."



Don't limit yourself to your blog - use Facebook, Twitter and Google Plus

Blogging can be great for personal growth but there is a lot more interaction on Twitter, Facebook and Google Plus nowadays as compared to blogs. If you have a blog, you must also have a Facebook "like" page (previously called "fan" page), a Twitter account, and probably a Google Plus page. These serve the dual purpose of distribution and commenting channels ("two-way street").

For example, Facebook pages get a lot more interaction than blogs for some medical journals - you can compare the number of comments on the NEJM Facebook updates (the range is 9-180) vs. their blog (0). The blog has comments enabled, of course.

Facebook is the clear "winner" in terms of commenting activity, it is not even close:

NEJM Facebook page vs. NEJM blog

This is a suggested simple project for all doctors in 2012:

1. Start on Twitter (microblog).
2. Continue on Blogger/WordPress.
3. Make an impact. Improve the quality of online health information and tell the public your side of the story.

How to Create a Blog on Blogger in 5 minutes (Google video):



Help your patients and your practice

I developed the concept of Two Interlocking Cycles:

- Cycle of Patient Education
- Cycle of Online Information and Physician Education

The two cycles work together as two interlocking cogwheels (TIC):



References:

Taking the Pulse of Pediatrics. PEDIATRICS Vol. 129 No. 1 January 1, 2012, pp. 168 -169 (doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3288).

Social media in medicine: How to be a Twitter superstar and help your patients and your practice

Patients directed to online tools don't necessarily use them: 25% checked website vs. 42% read same material on paper. Am Medical News, 2012.
Diary-Writing Has Psychological Benefits - Journal of Happiness Studies

Diary-Writing Has Psychological Benefits - Journal of Happiness Studies

Writing has long been used as a coping strategy and has been applied to improve psychological well-being. One study found that suicidal poets used more first-person singular pronouns (I, me, my) than the control group of poets.

This study from Taiwan, published in the Journal of Happiness Studies, investigated the psychological displacement paradigm in diary-writing (PDPD) and its supposed psychological benefits.

Study participants were randomly assigned to write about their recent negative life experiences two times a week for 2 weeks in PDPD group (diary-writing), or comparison group (no diary-writing).

The diary-writing group (PDPD) showed a decrease in negative emotion and an increase in positive emotion immediately after each writing session (short term effect).

They also had an increase in psychological well-being for at least 2 weeks (long term effect).

References:

The Psychological Displacement Paradigm in Diary-Writing (PDPD) and its Psychological Benefits. Jen-Ho Chang, Chin-Lan Huang and Yi-Cheng Lin. JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES 2012, DOI: 10.1007/s10902-012-9321-y

Comments from Google Plus and Twitter:

Lin W: I guess blog writing might have the same effect?

Ves Dimov, M.D.: It depends on the type of blogging you do, but yes, blogging can be a positive experience too.

Dr. Amal Hasan @DrFloona: Diary-Writing Has Psychological Benefits bit.ly/wwMDmr” Until someone else reads it

Dean Giustini @giustini: Diary-Writing Has Psychological Benefits bit.ly/wwMDmr [Isn't this why we blog Ves?]

@DrVes: Well, I'm not sure. I don't blog about "negative experiences". Blog = archive for me

The Number of Tweets Predicts Future Citations of a Specific Journal Article

Citations of journal articles and the impact factor are widely used measures of scientific impact. Web 2.0 tools such as Twitter, Facebook, blogs and social bookmarking tools provide the possibility to construct article-level or journal-level metrics to gauge impact and influence.

Between 2008 and 2011, all tweets containing links to articles in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) were data mined.The tweets were compared to subsequent citation data 17-29 months later.

4,000 tweets cited 280 JMIR articles. The distribution of tweets followed a power law, with most tweets sent on the day when an article was published (44% of all tweets in a 60-day period) or on the following day (16%), followed by a rapid decay.

The Pearson correlations between "tweetations" and regular citations were moderate and statistically significant (0.42 to 0.72).

Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be highly cited than less-tweeted articles.

Top-cited articles could be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93% specificity and 75% sensitivity.

Tweets can predict highly cited articles within the first 3 days of article publication.

Social media activity may:

- increase citations
- reflect the underlying qualities of the article

Social impact measures based on tweets are proposed to complement traditional citation metrics. The study author proposed a "twimpact" factor that measures uptake and filters research resonating with the public in real time.

After the initial publication, some science blogs have pointed out potential issues and conflicts of interests in relation to the topic and the single author who is also the founder, owner, and Editor-in-Chief of the journal. You can find more by performing a Google search for "twimpact" factor or checking the references section at the end of this post. Overall, I think this is an interesting concept and Gunther Eysenbach did a great job focusing the attention of the journal publishers on Twitter and Facebook as distribution channels that can also guide in measuring the impact of their articles.

References:

Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact. Gunther Eysenbach. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(4):e123.

New research plus twitter. Does it make a difference in the clinic. Heidi Allen Digital Strategy in Health.

'Highly Tweeted Articles Were 11 Times More Likely to Be Highly Cited'. The Atlantic.

Twimpact factors: can tweets really predict citations? BMJ.

Tweets, and Our Obsession with Alt Metrics

Image source: Twitter.com.

Comments from Twitter:

@paediatrix:  Interesting. Makes sense

Harris Lygidakis @lygidakis: And Twimpact Factor is a good sign of what's ahead!

When was the earliest journal club?

When was the earliest journal club?

The earliest references to journal clubs are in the memoirs and letters of Sir James Paget, a British surgeon, who described a group at St. Bartholomew’s Hospital in London in the mid-1800s as “a kind of club … a small room over a baker’s shop near the Hospital-gate where we could sit and read the journals.”

Sir William Osler established the first formal medical journal club at McGill University in Montreal in 1875. The original purpose of Osler’s journal club was “for the purchase and distribution of periodicals to which he could ill afford to subscribe” (see the excerpts from Google Books below).

References:
Journal clubs as a trigger for ’socializing’. The Search Principle blog.



Comments from Google Buzz:

Laika Spoetnik - Besides the point, but I have good memories of St Bartolomews. Here I learned direct sequencing and did part of my experiments. Very old building btw.

Aidan Finley - the father of Stephen Paget of "seed and soil" hypothesis.

Related reading:

Virtual Journal Club for Hospital Medicine by the Washington University in St. Louis
Electronic medical record (EMR) - review of pros and cons in Cleveland
Clinic medical journal

Electronic medical record (EMR) - review of pros and cons in Cleveland Clinic medical journal

Some negatives regarding the use of EMR:

- So far, electronic systems are not interconnectable
- Do electronic records improve or worsen the quality of care?
- Accuracy vs copying and pasting
- A third party in the examination room
- Devoid of real medical thought

A contrasting view:

- Connectivity will improve
- Staying focused on the patient, even with a computer in the room
- Doctor-doctor communication is enhanced

References:
The electronic medical record: Diving into a shallow pool? CCJM.
The electronic medical record: Learning to swim. CCJM.
"The iPatient is getting wonderful care across America. The real patient wonders, "Where is everybody?" NYTimes, 2011.

The First Journal Club on Twitter - Then and Now

The first journal club on Twitter in 2008

I think we started the first medical journal club on Twitter at the Allergy and Immunology program of Creighton University back in 2008. Please let me know if you are aware of an earlier journal club focused on medical articles and broadcasted or held exclusively on Twitter prior to that date. We published an abstract at the annual meeting of the The American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI) in 2009, with collaborators from Creighton University, Louisiana State University (LSU) in Shreveport and Cleveland Clinic. The abstract and the poster are embedded below:


The Utility of a Real-time Microblogging Service for Journal Club in Allergy and Immunology. Dimov, V.; Randhawa, S.; Auron, M.; Casale, T. American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI) 2009 Annual Meeting. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol., Vol 103:5, Suppl. 3, A126, Nov 2009.

Purpose

Internet-based services are an important source for communication and reference information for fellows in training in allergy and immunology. Our aim was to explore the utility of the free microbloging service Twitter.com to make the journal club educational activity more interactive.

Methods

We used the text message and Internet interfaces of the free microblogging service Twitter (http://twitter.com/) owned by Twitter, Inc. to post updates and summaries from the journal club activities at an Allergy and Immunology fellowship training program at an academic center. The updates were posted on a web site provided free of charge at http://twitter.com/AllergyNotes and simultaneously distributed to the cell phones of subscribers via text messages. The web site was freely available and comment were open to visitors. One fellow in training was assigned to update the microblogging service from his cell phone with the label "#JCAllergy" for easy referral and later retrieval from the Internet search interface.

Results

Five articles were discussed during a 2-hour journal club teaching session and 24 updates with links were posted on Twitter.com. The updates were followed in real time by 2 fellows at an Allergy and Immunology training program in a different state (not physically present at the meeting). Five fellows (out of 7, 71.4%) at two training programs expressed a favorable opinion of the use of the microblogging service to post updates from journal club.

Conclusion

The microblogging service Twitter can be used to share information from journal club in allergy and immunology and thus serves as an easy to implement form of distant learning for trainees and community allergists. The service is free to use and requires minimal equipment limited to an Internet-connected computer or a basic cell phone (not a smartphone) with activated text messaging service. A potential limitation of this approach may be the distractions that the reporting journal club participant may experience while simultaneously sending text messages and listening to the presentations. Twitter allows an immediate feedback from the journal club participants, following the updates from remote locations, which can enhance the educational aspects of this activity.


The concept of a journal club on Twitter has its own limitations inherent to the publishing medium and the enthusiasm of the participants. After a few months, we decided that the concept was interesting but ultimately the discussion of a journal article requires more than 140 characters.



The worldwide journal club on Twitter in 2011

In June 2011, a medical student and a junior doctor in the UK launched the idea of a journal club exclusively on Twitter. The social network and publishing medium of Twitter has grown tremendously from approximately 40 million accounts in 2008 to 150 million in 2011. The networks mass effect and the infectious enthusiasms of the two founders ensured a large participation in this new journal club on Twitter: http://twitjc.wordpress.com

I wish them best of success in this new educational endeavor. I think it is a great effort and it should be strongly encouraged.

My general comment on the 2008 concept, and this new 2011 version of journal club on Twitter, was that “we need to go beyond this 1950s model rather than adapt it to social media”. To be exact, Sir William Osler established the first formalized journal club at McGill University in Montreal in 1875 (http://j.mp/aGEvB0), but the concept itself seemed to get traction after the 1950s.

I think it would be a good idea to ask the participants themselves what they would like to see in a journal club on Twitter, i.e. "crowdsource" the community. This can be done via a Google Forms poll with a free text option for additional suggestions.

Dr. Stuart Flanagan tweeted that this could be an opportunity to develop or even reinvent the Journal Club model, and it could be a very exciting project. I agree, and will try to add a few specific ideas in a future blog post.

If we stay just on Twitter, this may look like another topical Twitter chat. For example, what are the major differences between "Journal Club on Twitter" and a Twitter chat on a topic?

In addition, Twitter may not be the best way for article discussion. It is just the popular tool at this time. Google Buzz is an alternative service that works well for this purpose but the major problem is that very few people use it. Buzz is a better medium than Twitter for a journal club from a technical point of view. It is easier to follow the conversation threads - this is one its main advantages and Facebook has it too. The search function of Buzz works well while Twitter Search traditionally “forgets” tweets older than 7 days.

Please have a look at the transcript of the first edition of #twitjc and you will realize how challenging is to follow a conversation on Twitter: http://www.scribd.com/doc/57191306/TwitJC-Transcript-5-6-2011

Reading a 30-page Twitter chat transcript with all @ handles, hashtags and timestamps included is not for everyone. Some editing of the transcript would make it more readable. We tried this with the original journal club in 2008, on a much smaller scale of course: http://allergynotes.blogspot.com/2008/12/allergy-and-immunology-journal-club-on.html

How about Journal Club on Facebook? I don't think that JC on either Facebook or Twitter (or blog comments) take the concept to a fundamentally new level.

In any case, Cleveland Clinic, ever the innovator, actually has a Journal Club on Facebook. Dr. Neil Mehta wrote a great summary on their model, using Google Reader and Facebook, check it out here: http://goo.gl/rnw2P



In conclusion, from personal experience, I would say that you can only learn when people criticize your project - it is the most helpful kind of feedback that you typically get for free.

Please consider visiting the website and Twitter account of this new Twitter Journal Club (http://twitjc.wordpress.com), follow the hashtag #TwitJC and enjoy the new editions.

Comments from Twitter:

@DrVes: Did you find #TwitJC useful? @EugenieReich is looking for scientists to be interviewed in Nature. I think the second event was very engaging and useful. That said, #TwitJC is more a Twitter chat on a topic/article rather than a Journal Club as we think of it in the U.S. This brings me to the third tweet on the topic: Do we need separate #meded tags for different parts of the world? http://bit.ly/maPEwm

@amcunningham: well, it's a journal club the way we think of it in the UK... A noisy, hectic one!- but gets the job done :) #TwitJC

@DrVes: Right. Different from what we typically do here, e.g. discuss every detail of a recent (very recent) article, focused on one topic.

Related reading:

Twitter Journal Club: yet another ‘revolution’ in scientific communication? BMJ http://t.co/NrB7KAJ - Any plans for Google+ Journal Club now?

Virtual Journal Club for Hospital Medicine by the Washington University in St. Louis

International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: 12-Month Experience http://buff.ly/NErFFk
Surgical Opinion: Keys to a Successful International Journal Club on Twitter http://buff.ly/NErPwl